Reflections on Obedience and Authority by Juan Enrique Zegers A

-

I want to offer some reflections from a friend of mine, Juan Enrique Zegers A, on the questions of obedience and authority. These are not my thoughts, but I share them as a reflection because I found this compilation of his to be quite beautiful:

What if I am right, and "the wise man" or the authority is wrong? Several cases can happen:

A. One's own opinion seems best, but it is not so because of personal error or because the authority has more data.

B. That opinion that is best for me is worse for others and the authority must seek the good of all.

C. That opinion is best for all and the authority is wrong.
In the latter case should it be obeyed?

There are also several possibilities:

A. If the matter is of little importance - it is normal - one obeys and that's it: one loses the good of correctness, but gains the good of peace and of the exercise of obedience.

B. If the matter is important, one tries to clarify it by speaking with the authority or with one's superiors. Always looking for the good, not for pride.

Is it always necessary to obey?

It is the normal thing, the simplest thing and what the Lord foresaw when He created man as a social being. However, it can happen that some authority orders actions contrary to the law of God. In this case "we must obey God rather than men", but without disrespecting the authority, as the Lord also desires.

The decision to obey is proof of intelligent freedom, which knows how to dispense with one's own tastes for the common good. In fact, the most perfect man was obedient until death and death on the Cross; in this case obedient to God the Father.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two Logical Arguments in Favor of the "Infallible Safety" of the Ordinary Magisterium

-
Image
Thesis: Individuals cannot and ought not accuse the Ordinary Magisterium (OM) of Pope Francis as having had promulgated heresy or serious error. NOTE: Definitions of terms used in this post, and in this blog more widely can be found here . My reasoning for this is two-fold: (1) Why I assert that Pope Francis cannot be accused of heresy. This is because I assess that each instance of Francis' ordinary  magisterium which is accused of such heresy can be interpreted (and thus should be interpreted) in an orthodox manner. Thus, the evidence of such heresy is not blatantly obvious; hence the evidence of such heresy is likewise ambiguous. In an instance of ambiguity, the most charitable interpretation should be rendered the acceptable one. [I hope to eventually address argument (1) more specifically by taking a look at the instances in which the OM of Francis has been accused of heresy or serious error, and why such interpretations are not the only interpretations that can b...
Read more

The Theological Censures

-
Image
The following is my paraphrase and synthesis of the Catholic Encyclopedia (NewAdvent) on the Theological Censures of the Catholic Church. I have quoted and given a link to the entire section at the end of this article. A discussion of the Theological Censures may be divided into three (3) main categories: (I) The significance and definitions of condemned propositions. (II) The expression of condemned propositions. (III) The consequences of condemned propositions.   (I) The significance and definitions of condemned propositions: NOTE: I posit that the censures in this section can additionally be categorized as the following, which is evidenced by the aforementioned Encyclopedia's descriptions of such: i. Dangerous Errors: All censures in sections A, B, & C. ii. Undetermined: The censure in section D - Temeratia (rash). iii. Safe Errors: All censures of section E. (By "safe," I mean "not dangerous to one's salvation.) A. Hæretica  (heretical) 1. A p...
Read more

DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED IN THIS BLOG

-
DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED IN THIS BLOG [This page will be updated continually as I create more posts. I will add more definitions as I deem it necessary. If there are words I have used which you would like me to define and add to this page, please feel free to contact me at parkerzurbuchcatechesis@gmail.com ] Ambiguity : A proposition which can be interpreted in two or more senses, one of which is unacceptable. Authentic Interpreter : This phrase, in regard to the Church's Magisterium, comes from Vatican II's Dei Verbum 10. The original latin is "authentice interpretandi." The word "authentice" has meant in the past (14th century) to mean "authoritative." Some have posited that "authentice" in the context of Dei Verbum 10 uses this older definition of "authoritative." The modern word "authentic" generally means "corresponding to the fact" instead of "authoritative." Dangerous Error* : I consider a ...
Read more